4/24/2010
After Fischerʼs disastrous Round 1 loss, chief arbiter Lothar Schmid received a tight-lipped note from Fred Cramer, Bobbyʼs manager. Emphasizing Fischerʼs cooperation in playing the first game at all despite the fact that "certain playing conditions were not entirely as specified," Cramer passed on his demand that certain changes be made before he would consent to play Round 2. These demands comprised, among other things, the removal of all camera equipment from the playing hall. The note closed testily:
I wish to make it clear, Lothar, that Bobby will not enter the playing hall until the work has been completed. I do not consider his request unreasonable nor, do I think, will you.
Very sincerely,
Fred Cramer
United States Chess Federation
Despite indications of willingness to comply with Fischerʼs demands on the part of the officials, the cameras had not been removed come the second round. Fischer sulked in his room, refusing to come to the board. His clock was started at 5 P.M. sharp. After letting it run for 35 minutes, the organizers finally agreed to stop the cameras, but Bobby insisted that his clock be set back to zero before he would play. A full hour passed, and Fischerʼs chair remained empty. He had forfeited the game, and Spassky was awarded the full point. Fischer now faced a daunting task: Not only did he have to recover from a crushing 0-2 start, but he had to do so with the Black pieces because he had just thrown away a valuable white with the forfeit. Needless to say, an outraged letter from Bobby was not long in coming. He protested the forfeit and ranted about the "grossly below ... minimum" conditions, entering into fuming detail about the unsatisfactory nature and placement of the camera equipment. Finally, he demanded that the forfeit be revoked and that he be given a re-play of Round 2 under satisfactory conditions. He concluded with these words:
When that happens, and when all camera equipment and supporting equipment has been removed from the hall, I will be at the chessboard. I am keen to play this match, and I hope Game Two will be scheduled for Sunday, July 16 at five in the afternoon.
Sincerely,
Bobby Fischer
Determined not to give up prospects of televising the match, Chester Fox (yes, that Fox) entrusted the next stage of the battle to the oily eloquence of his lawyer, who wrote a letter urging Fischer to reconsider his demands. With a slick, delicate balance of wheedling and flattery, Mr. Stein (of Stein and Fredericks, Esqs.) expressed his fervent wish to accommodate Fischer in any way and offered his sincere admiration "for the elevation of Chess in the eyes of the people of the States, through your herculean efforts." Nevertheless, he gently pressed that due to Fischerʼs status as a "folk hero" of his country, it was his duty to "permit millions of Americans to share this experience" through the medium of televison. The note closed with a repetition of his desire to work out a solution to the problem, "which distresses us all, and which we are eager and anxious to ameliorate." "Surely," he cajoled soothingly, "we can come to a reasonable agreement."
Fischer had no intention of coming to a reasonable agreement, and it was not until he received a last-minute, personal phone call from Secretary of State Henry Kissinger that he agreed to lump the forfeit and play Round 3. Even then, trouble arose as Bobby discovered a closed-circuit TV camera in the dingy, backstage ping-pong room to which the game had been moved in supposed compliance with his demands. Spassky made his first move and tapped the clock, but Fischer let his time run while arguing with the match officials about the camera. Much to everybodyʼs relief, he finally sat down and made his move after five minutes of fruitless protest. The game was on, and now the question hung in the minds of all spectators: Could Bobby pull out the win and climb back into the match...or not? And what would he do if he lost?
Here is Game 3:
12/23/2009
It is perhaps the most famous world chess championship match in history--Bobby Fischer vs. Boris Spassky, Reykjavik 1972. It was an achievement unparalleled at the time and never equalled since--an American winning the World Championship. No American chess player has ever gone so far, so fast as Fischer. No American chess player has dominated the world of chess so completely, with such ease as Fischer. By the time he came to face Spassky, he had already whitewashed Mark Taimanov and Bent Larsen 12-0 and crushed Tigran Petrosian 6.5-2.5. Now, only the incumbent champion stood in the way of the ultimate crown.
But there was much more that hung in the balance here than a world championship. It was a clash of two worlds: America and Soviet Russia. It was a struggle that had captured the hearts and minds of the American people--the picture of Fischer, brilliant, laconic, a lone wolf without training or trainer, singlehandedly taking on the super-power of chess that was the Soviet Union. The American spirit swelled with indignation at the Russians’ cheating tactics, and Fischer himself wasted no opportunity to speak out against the methods whereby Russia had obtained its stranglehold on the world of chess. Now, here lay a golden opportunity for the free world, a chance for a victory that would stretch beyond the boundaries of the chess board and leave its mark for years to come.
Perhaps it would be of interest to the reader if we turned our eyes to examine the incumbent champion himself: Boris Spassky. Dark, clean-cut, compact and athletic, the 35-year-old Spassky is hardly your stereotypical chess player. He is also not your typical Soviet Russian. Unlike many of his colleagues in the chess world, Spassky has never joined the Communist Party. He carries himself with quiet dignity, speaking in low, courteous tones. He takes his game seriously but has refused to become obsessed with it, spending four hours a day at the most in preparation for the crucial match. Gently self-deprecating, he describes himself as a "lazy Russian bear" who does not take months to prepare but "make[s] up for it by working much harder while the game is in progress." His feelings at the board are a mixed bag of emotions. In his own words, "Sometimes I feel a great spirit of fight which drives me on." But "deep down, I lack faith in myself." Though he maintains the same stiff poker face regardless of the position, Spassky insists that appearances are not all as they seem: "Actually I feel very nervous inside during a game--as if there was an explosion in progress...During a game I seem very unruffled, but this is not really so. It is like a clown’s face put on for the occasion. When I appear particularly calm, I am really feeling especially nervous." Yet it appears that Spassky must be a very good actor indeed, for Fischer describes his playing demeanor thus: "Spassky sits at the board with the same dead expression whether he’s mating or being mated. He can blunder away a piece and you are never sure whether it’s a blunder or a fantastically deep sacrifice."
The 29-year-old Fischer, by contrast, cuts a tall, broad-shouldered, gangling figure. Ever since his childhood years, he has held the world in contempt. He is a recluse who shies from cameras and prefers to live in his own isolated world. His manner is blunt and often rude, his compliments few and far between. As many a tournament organizer will tell you, he has more than once caused trouble by making exact demands for tournament conditions and threatening not to participate should they go unmet. He amuses himself with ping-pong, bowling, and swimming, but none of these things can take the place of his one consuming passion: chess. Fischer lives and breathes chess morning, noon, and night. "All I want to do, ever, is play chess," he declared once as a boy, and his life’s desire has not changed with age. A solitary genius, he prefers to prepare alone. For his match with Spassky, only one or two have been allowed into his private circle, while the champion is surrounded by a team of seconds who are constantly churning out ideas for him. However, while Spassky is unwilling to make any predictions for the match, Fischer is confident of victory. For him, it is "when," not "if" he beats Spassky. This is ironic, as he has lost to Spassky no fewer than three times in individual tournament encounters. Yet he claims to have been "world champion in everything but name for the past ten years," though he grudgingly admits that "next to me, Spassky is the best." He goes on to defend his statement by saying, "I don’t say that to brag. I think it’s true. I love the game--and I hate the Russians because they’ve almost ruined it. They only risk the title when they have to, every three years. When I’m champion I’ll take on all comers." What is Spassky’s take on Fischer? "I like Fischer’s style very much. I like the purity of his play--very logical. His personality is very explosive. He’s a real fanatic. I feel fond of him."
The match is set to be 24 games long, and the first player to earn 12.5 or 13 points will be the winner. If the match is tied, Spassky will retain his title. Each player will be given 2.5 hours to complete their first 40 moves, then another hour for every 16 moves beyond 40. Each player has drawn lots, and Spassky will have the white pieces for Game 1.
To play through the game with full annotations, click here. 8/29/2008
Greetings all! I bring you a tasty morsel from the renowned "King of Swindlers," Frank Marshall. But Marshall doesn't exactly "swindle" his opponent in this game. The word "pulverize," however, does come to mind. A defining moment:
White to move
White's Bishop is under attack, but Black's back is against the wall. Is there a way to take advantage of this? Or should White take the advice of the old proverb, "He who runs away lives to fight another day?"
Marshall?
Move backwards?
Naaaaah.
7/6/2008
Click here for a tremendously satisfying Open Games cruncher by the legendary I. A. Horowitz. Though he always went by his middle name, "Al", his first name was Israel. Draw your own conclusions. And take a shot at finding the brilliant combination below:
White to move
Here's a game from Arnold Denker, commonly known as the Dean of American Chess. Our hero was in a fighting mood and whipped out a Danish. The result: chaos, confusion, and a magnificently unpolished street fight. Below, try to figure out how he put the final nail in Black's coffin:
White to move
Note the tell-tale Danish Bishops and the fact that most of Black's army is all set up for game 2. Crazy, man!
4/6/2008The hero of this game is Simon Winawer, who was known for his zany, tactical play. Not even Steinitz's famed defensive techniques were good enough to fend Winawer off in this game. Buckle your seatbelts and hang on! This is the penultimate position. Find the move that seals Black's fate:
White to move
My apologies for not posting in the month of March. To make up for my laziness, I am posting two games this month. First off we have a 14-move cruncher from the 1920's. Black tosses off a Sicilian (!) but fares no better than Fezzini in The Princess Bride... The diagram below shows the position right before the knockout punch:
White to move
2/15/2008For this month, we have a 15-move mini-masterpiece from the well-known chess master Edward Lasker. The diagram below depicts the moment right before the final blow:
White to move
Click here for the game with annotations.
1/13/2008
For our first game of the year, we have a delightful miniature from Mikhail Tchigorin, one of the early masters of chess. His opponent, Carl Schlechter, was a serious contender for the world championship and actually drew a match with Emmanuel Lasker. However, Lasker needed only to draw the match in order to retain his title, and so his reign continued. Yet powerful as Schlechter was, he was convincingly thumped in this game, a position from which is given below:
White to move
12/14/2007
A pivotal moment in our final classic game of the year:
Black to move
Click here for the solution and the game.
|
|
|
|
|